Designers and builders
Visual imagery supports rapid mental prototyping before spending time in tools.
Imagination Type
Visual imagination is your ability to create internal pictures without external input. This includes color, shape, distance, motion, and fine detail.
People are not the same on this dimension. Some experience crisp, almost cinematic images; others report dim or unstable images, and some report no conscious visual image at all. Tools like the VVIQ (Marks, 1973) and revised versions (VVIQ-2, VVIQ-RV) are widely used to measure this—with strong reliability and validity—though self-report always depends on how you interpret the scale.
If you have ever wondered why one person says, "I can see it clearly," while another says, "I understand it but cannot picture it," visual imagination is usually the reason.
Last reviewed: Feb 16, 2026
Visual imagery supports rapid mental prototyping before spending time in tools.
Visual chunking can improve recall of diagrams, process maps, and structure-heavy information.
Visual metaphors can make complex ideas easier for teams to grasp quickly.
Developed by David Marks (1973). Self-report with 16 items (VVIQ-2 has 32); rates vividness on a 5-point scale. Revised versions (VVIQ-2, VVIQ-RV) show strong psychometric properties. Widely used to study aphantasia to hyperphantasia.
Multisensory imagery scale (Dance et al., 2022) that includes visual sub-items alongside auditory, olfactory, and other modalities—so visual scores can be compared with other senses.
Reality: Creativity can be linguistic, conceptual, auditory, social, or procedural. Visual vividness is only one expression of imagination.
Reality: Individual differences are normal. Imagery style is a cognitive trait, not a personal failure.
Reality: Research shows that action observation—watching a movement or scene and then imagining it—can improve imagery scores when pure visualization is difficult. Consistency (e.g. 10–15 min daily) matters more than intensity.
This page is educational and grounded in psychometric and sensory imagery research. For methodological details, use the primary sources below.
Most people are mixed across senses. Comparing dimensions is often more useful than interpreting one score in isolation.
How vividly you can imagine sounds, voices, music, and acoustic scenes internally.
How clearly you can imagine smells such as coffee, rain, perfume, or smoke.
How vividly you can imagine taste qualities like sweet, sour, bitter, salty, and umami.
No. Creativity can be verbal, conceptual, social, auditory, or kinesthetic. Visual vividness is only one dimension.
Yes. Training studies show that structured practice (e.g. six weeks of imagery exercises) can improve self-reported vividness; control groups with no practice show little change. Some people who find visualization hard benefit more from action observation—watching and then imagining—than from pure mental imagery.
Try the one-item check: imagine a friend's face with eyes closed and rate 1 (no image) to 5 (perfectly clear). Or compare mental vs real timing: visualize a familiar task, time it, then do it; closer match often reflects stronger imagery. These are not diagnostic—they give you a rough sense of your experience.
Deep dives on imagination, measurement, and using your profile.
See how others use their profile in a case study, or take the free assessment to map your full six-sense Imagery Profile.